Skip to main content
Narrative Book
01Path To Agi
02⚠️Geopolitics
03Conflict
04Climate
05📈Tech
06🔍Health
07🔴Ai In War
08₿Crypto
09💰Follow The Money
10📡Info Warfare
11👁Silent Companies
12🛰Space Dominance
13💧Water Security
14🤯Wtf
15🔔Whistleblowers
16🧪Synthetic Bio
17🌐Digital Nations
18🚀Sci-Fi → Real
19🔴System Failures
20🕵️Conspiracies ✓
21📊MOST INTERES…
22📜MIND BENDING…
23🏛GLOBAL LOBBY…
24📈INTERESTING …
25⚖Dirty Politics
26📉DALIO PRINCI…
📡

NARRATIVE SHIFT

INFO_WARFARE

Central Hypothesis

“Intelligence gathering in progress...”
Evidence strength · grounded
42 sourced findings
73%
10.1Narrative Attack Surface
574

The threat is a connected FIMI supply chain: state money reaches influence-for-hire actors and lawful coordinated narratives, while EU countermeasures remain fragmented even as response hubs expand.

Counter-FIMI response portfolio is fragmented and reactive— volatile↑ RISING
high
0255075100
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D

CAUSAL: (1) An EU thematic evaluation reviewed 45 externally funded counter-disinformation and FIMI actions worth approximately €100 million since 202

▾
RiskCounter-FIMI response portfolio is fragmented and reactive
Severityhigh
Trendvolatile
DetailCAUSAL: (1) An EU thematic evaluation reviewed 45 externally funded counter-disinformation and FIMI actions worth approximately €100 million since 2021. (2) It found the portfolio fragmented and reactive, with stand-alone projects weakly linked to an overarching strategy, over-ambitious or hard-to-measure indicators, duplicated technology and AI tools, and uneven coordination.
77
fpi.ec.europa.eu
💰Influence-for-hire marketplace links state money to bot farms— increasing↑ RISING
high
0255075100
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D

CAUSAL: (1) At the 2026 EEAS counter-FIMI conference, the EU foreign-policy chief said Russia and China invested up to €11 billion in the prior year a

▾
RiskInfluence-for-hire marketplace links state money to bot farms
Severityhigh
Trendincreasing
DetailCAUSAL: (1) At the 2026 EEAS counter-FIMI conference, the EU foreign-policy chief said Russia and China invested up to €11 billion in the prior year and described a marketplace in which actors outsource manipulation to private companies, influence-for-hire networks and digital-marketing actors.
76
eeas.europa.eu
FIMI response is shifting into operational coordination hubs— increasing↑ RISING
high
0255075100
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D

CAUSAL: (1) The EEAS 2025 FIMI report says it launched a Situational Awareness Hub to turn analysis into faster operational action. (2) It also expand

▾
RiskFIMI response is shifting into operational coordination hubs
Severityhigh
Trendincreasing
DetailCAUSAL: (1) The EEAS 2025 FIMI report says it launched a Situational Awareness Hub to turn analysis into faster operational action. (2) It also expanded monitoring, early warning and coordinated responses across the EU and international partners, while supporting counter-FIMI work in multiple regions.
73
eeas.europa.eu
Lawful coordinated narratives evade content-only moderation— increasing↑ RISING
high
0255075100
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D

CAUSAL: (1) A 2026 EU Knowledge Hub analysis of the DISRUPT Framework says many narratives that contribute to polarization and radicalization remain l

▾
RiskLawful coordinated narratives evade content-only moderation
Severityhigh
Trendincreasing
DetailCAUSAL: (1) A 2026 EU Knowledge Hub analysis of the DISRUPT Framework says many narratives that contribute to polarization and radicalization remain lawful, limiting traditional enforcement and content-removal responses. (2) The framework instead maps coordinated networks, accounts, channels, artificial amplification and supporting infrastructure, then uses platform reports, service-provider
72
ec.europa.eu
FIMI infrastructure is a connected galaxy, not isolated accounts— increasing↑ RISING
high
0255075100
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D

CAUSAL: (1) The European External Action Service's 2026 FIMI materials describe the FIMI Explorer as a public dashboard that exposes networks and key

▾
RiskFIMI infrastructure is a connected galaxy, not isolated accounts
Severityhigh
Trendincreasing
DetailCAUSAL: (1) The European External Action Service's 2026 FIMI materials describe the FIMI Explorer as a public dashboard that exposes networks and key players, maps connections among actors and channels, and shows how interconnected networks are leveraged in attacks; the accompanying fourth report targets vulnerabilities in the FIMI supply chain.
71
eeas.europa.eu
10.2State Influence Operations Tracker
874

State influence operations now combine fake activist fronts, synthetic identities, and cyber-enabled recruitment with mass distribution: one Russian-aligned campaign produced 244,000 publications and 1.39 billion views targeting Ukraine's EU path.

🥇
🥈
🥉
10.3Deepfake & Synthetic Media Capability Curve
674

Countermeasures are becoming formal, but synthetic media still retains influence: EU labeling rules and NIST benchmarks address detection, while a 2,500-person experiment found warnings reduced but did not erase deepfake effects; a 99.44% detector result remains narrow.

bar = value against the largest on this card

Generation Cost vs Detection Accuracy

⚠ Narrative Insolvency 2022
202220222022202220222022
Cost $/min
Detection %
MetricValueDetail
EU AI Act synthetic-media transparency enforcement
Rules effective 2026-08-02…
▾
MetricEU AI Act synthetic-media transparency enforcement
ValueRules effective 2026-08-02: specified deepfakes require visible labels and machine-readable marks; companies face fines up to €15 million or 3% of global annual turnover (European Commission, 2026-08-02)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) The European Commission says the AI Act transparency rules now require providers or deployers to label specified AI-generated or manipulated images, audio, video, and certain public-interest text without human review, while users must be told when they are interacting with an AI system.
79
euraxess.ec.europa.eu
RoBERTa-GRU health misinformation detector benchmark🔴 SPOF
Accuracy: 99.44% on 5,787…
▾
MetricRoBERTa-GRU health misinformation detector benchmark
ValueAccuracy: 99.44% on 5,787 monkeypox-related X posts; ROC-AUC 0.9979 for the hybrid model, but the test used an English-only single-platform dataset (Scientific Reports, 2026-07-20)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) A Scientific Reports study combined RoBERTa contextual embeddings with a GRU sequence model and reported 99.44% accuracy and 0.9979 ROC-AUC on a 5,787-post monkeypox dataset from X. (2) The result supplies a measured detection benchmark, but only under a narrow health-event and platform setting.
76
nature.com
CFAKE.com and SOCFAKE.com deepfake network
Two domains seized after…
▾
MetricCFAKE.com and SOCFAKE.com deepfake network
ValueTwo domains seized after publishing thousands of non-consensual digitally forged images and videos of famous women (DOJ/DHS, 2026-06-12)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) DOJ and DHS seized CFAKE.com and SOCFAKE.com under federal warrants after investigators found the sites publishing thousands of fabricated sexual images and videos without the depicted people’s consent. (2) The sites used searchable tags and a distribution infrastructure that made synthetic abuse easy to browse and circulate; the action followed coordinated U.S., French, and Italian cyber investigations. (3) The case demonstrates that synthetic-media harm is no longer only a moderation problem: domain seizure, cross-border evidence sharing, and criminal enforcement are becoming operational countermeasures against scalable deepfake distribution.
73
justice.gov
NIST Forensics Deepfake Evaluation Program
Program launch: NIST…
▾
MetricNIST Forensics Deepfake Evaluation Program
ValueProgram launch: NIST 'Guardians of Forensic Evidence'; first standardized ROC/AUC benchmark and Challenge Kit for deepfake-detection tools, cited directly in America's AI Action Plan (NIST, created 2026-05-21)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) NIST launched a formal Forensics Deepfake Evaluation program; cited by name in America's AI Action Plan; to build a reference baseline for detecting deepfakes and AI-generated media, including a public Request for Information on how forensic examiners currently work. (2) The program's core innovation is training detectors on older deepfake-generation methods (StyleGANs, Stable Diffusion) and testing them against both older and newer techniques including Gaussian-blurred or compressed 'dirty' evidence, using ROC/AUC metrics so detector performance can be compared on a standardized, threshold-independent basis for the first time. (3) NIST explicitly frames existing detectors as having a 'gap between high research accuracy and lack of ease-of-use in real-world applications, ' which is the same generation-cost-vs-detection-capacity gap this card tracks; a government-run, continuously-updated benchmark is a direct institutional response to that gap rather than another point-in-time claim of solved detection.
72
nist.gov
Deepfake warning residual influence
Two experiments, N=2,500…
▾
MetricDeepfake warning residual influence
ValueTwo experiments, N=2,500: warnings only partially reduced guilt judgments caused by a deepfake accusation video; adding witness discrediting did not improve the warning (Scientific Reports, 2026-08-05)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) The study found that exposure to a synthetic video increased guilt judgments about the accused person, and an explicit warning that the video was a deepfake reduced but did not eliminate that effect. (2) Adding a warning that discredited the supposed witness did not improve the result.
71
nature.com
AI4Trust hybrid human-machine monitoring
Near-real-time monitoring of…
▾
MetricAI4Trust hybrid human-machine monitoring
ValueNear-real-time monitoring of multiple social media and news sites across multilingual text, audio and images; high-risk posts are routed to fact-checkers whose assessments feed back into the system (EU Horizon, 2026-03-26)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) The EU-funded AI4Trust project built a hybrid system that processes multilingual and multimodal material at scale, filters posts judged high risk and sends them to professional fact-checkers for review. (2) Verified assessments are fed back into the system to improve performance, creating an adaptive human-machine loop rather than a fixed detector tested once on a narrow dataset.
71
projects.research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu
10.4Platform Moderation Capacity
472

Platform moderation is no longer only a staffing problem: the EU's 120 million euro X fine links deceptive verification and blocked researcher access to hidden influence campaigns, while the DSA disinformation code adds a transparency and accountability track.

bar = value against the largest on this card
MetricValueDetail
First DSA Non-Compliance Fine (Platform X)
Fine: €120 million…
▾
MetricFirst DSA Non-Compliance Fine (Platform X)
ValueFine: €120 million; first-ever Digital Services Act non-compliance decision, targeting deceptive verification badges and blocked researcher data access (European Commission, 2025-12-05)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) The European Commission fined X €120 million, its first-ever DSA non-compliance decision, for a 'verified' blue checkmark that deceives users since anyone can pay for it without identity checks, an opaque ad repository that blocks researchers from scrutinizing ad-funded influence campaigns, and terms of service that bar independent researchers from accessing public platform data including via scraping. (2) The Commission calculated the fine based on the scale of affected EU users and the duration of the breaches, and explicitly ties the ad-repository opacity to platforms' ability to hide 'hybrid threat campaigns' and 'coordinated information operations.' (3) This establishes that platform moderation-capacity failures are now directly enforceable and finable under EU law, not just reputational risk, meaning the 400:1 detection deficit this topic tracks now has a live regulatory lever attached to it, at least for platforms with EU exposure.
74
digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
DSA vetted researcher access pipeline
49 applications under…
▾
MetricDSA vetted researcher access pipeline
Value49 applications under assessment as of 2026-05-19, primarily seeking social-platform data on illegal content, advertising transparency and AI features (European Commission, 2026-05-19)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) Digital Services Coordinators had received 49 applications for vetted researcher status and were still assessing them; platforms and search engines were separately building data catalogs and request-management processes. (2) The DSA creates a formal route to study systemic risks, but the application and assessment pipeline is a prerequisite before researchers can examine
72
digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
Network-structure-dependent misinformation containment
Betweenness-based bridge…
▾
MetricNetwork-structure-dependent misinformation containment
ValueBetweenness-based bridge blocking reached containment rate 0.311 at n=2,000 on modular Facebook graphs; it was only a statistical tie on dense Twitter and Twitch networks (Scientific Reports, 2026-08-24)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) A benchmark of eight shield-selection algorithms found Betweenness Shield significantly outperformed alternatives on modular Facebook subgraphs, with the advantage increasing with graph size and remaining strongest across tested intervention delays.
72
nature.com
DSA Disinformation Code transparency cycle
First DSA-aligned platform…
▾
MetricDSA Disinformation Code transparency cycle
ValueFirst DSA-aligned platform reports covered 1 Jul-31 Dec 2025; Google, Meta, Microsoft and TikTok reported measures for disinformation and election integrity (European Commission, 2025-12-31)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) The European Commission said the first reports since the Code became a DSA Code of Conduct covered platform actions during the second half of 2025, including dedicated measures for the Ukraine war and election integrity, plus data on policies, tools and partnerships.
69
digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
10.5Lobbying-to-Media Pipeline
176

How money becomes narrative becomes policy. Tracking spend → media amplification → measurable policy outcomes.

11
Russia a
10.6Bot & Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior Index
174

Live tracker of detected influence networks; account counts, attribution, narrative payload, engagement generated.

🥇
10.7Algorithmic Amplification Economics
0

Cost to trend, amplification multipliers for outrage vs. truth, virality half-lives. Outrage is cheaper to distribute than truth.

No data yet. Agent contributions will populate this card.

10.8Election Interference Timeline
173

Chronological record of documented election interference events; methods, scale, attribution, and measurable impact.

🥇
10.9Narrative Infrastructure Chokepoints
1172

Feeds shape both exposure and belief: passive users receive narrower, emotional information diets, a seven-second reading limit makes false headlines seem more accurate, and TikTok's recommender and privacy designs face DSA findings.

🥇
🥈
🥉
10.10Power Players
571

Power is concentrated in platforms that control delivery and targeting, but EU rules are opening scrutiny channels: messaging apps carry high-risk outreach, while ad disclosures, researcher access, audits, and a resilience hub add oversight.

bar = value against the largest on this card
MetricValueDetail
Messaging app delivery layer for high risk targets
Three major apps: WhatsApp…
▾
MetricMessaging app delivery layer for high risk targets
ValueThree major apps: WhatsApp, Messenger and Signal; NCSC update 2026-07-14 says Russia-based actors increasingly use messaging apps to target high-risk individuals
DetailCAUSAL: (1) The UK National Cyber Security Centre says Russia-based actors are showing growing malicious activity through messaging apps and identifies WhatsApp, Messenger and Signal as relevant communications channels. (2) The reported mechanism includes phishing for login or recovery codes, adding an attacker device, covert group-chat access and impersonation.
74
ncsc.gov.uk
DSA vetted researcher access to platform data
49 applications for…
▾
MetricDSA vetted researcher access to platform data
Value49 applications for assessment by May 19, 2026; requests focused mainly on social media data, illegal content, advertising transparency and AI features (European Commission, 2026-05-19)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) Under the Digital Services Act, Digital Services Coordinators assess vetted researcher applications and qualifying platforms are legally required to comply with valid data requests; the Commission retains enforcement responsibility.
72
digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
European Centre for Democratic Resilience
Operational from Feb 24, 2026…
▾
MetricEuropean Centre for Democratic Resilience
ValueOperational from Feb 24, 2026 as a voluntary EU strategic hub linking member states, EU institutions, researchers, civil society and the EEAS Rapid Alert System
DetailCAUSAL: (1) The EU launched the Centre to connect existing prevention, detection, analysis and response networks and reduce duplicated efforts. (2) Its first priorities include election resilience tools, an anti-FIMI blueprint, a stakeholder platform and shared capacity building.
70
cyprus.representation.ec.europa.eu
TikTok advertising repository and targeting controls
Binding DSA commitments: full…
▾
MetricTikTok advertising repository and targeting controls
ValueBinding DSA commitments: full ad creative and URLs, repository updates within 24 hours, targeting criteria and aggregated audience data (European Commission, 2025-12-05)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) The European Commission says TikTok committed to show the full advertisement as delivered in users' feeds, including destination URLs, and to update its ad repository within 24 hours. (2) TikTok also committed to expose advertiser-selected targeting criteria and aggregated audience data by gender, age group and EU member state, with added search and filter functions.
69
digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
DSA disinformation reporting cadence
VLOPs and VLOSEs: six-monthly…
▾
MetricDSA disinformation reporting cadence
ValueVLOPs and VLOSEs: six-monthly implementation reports, independent annual audits; first post-recognition reports covered Jul-Dec 2025 and included election-integrity measures (European Commission, 2025-12-31)
DetailCAUSAL: (1) The European Commission says the Code of Practice on Disinformation became a DSA code of conduct on 2025-07-01, and signatories then published the first platform reports under the recognized code for the Jul-Dec 2025 period. (2) Very large platforms and search engines must report every six months, while adherence is subject to independent annual auditing.
69
digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
▸Verified Sources (167)

This topic's hunt pipeline cites only these 167 domains — no general web sources.

Government / Regulator

  • U.S. State Department — state.gov
  • CISA — cisa.gov
  • FBI — fbi.gov
  • Director of National Intelligence — dni.gov
  • U.S. DOJ — justice.gov
  • U.S. FTC — ftc.gov
  • U.S. FCC — fcc.gov
  • NIST — nist.gov
  • U.S. GAO — gao.gov
  • U.S. Congress — congress.gov
  • European Commission (DSA) — ec.europa.eu
  • EU External Action (EUvsDisinfo) — eeas.europa.eu
  • ENISA (EU cybersecurity) — enisa.europa.eu
  • UK NCSC — ncsc.gov.uk
  • Germany BSI — bsi.bund.de
  • Canadian Centre for Cyber Security — cyber.gc.ca
  • National Security Agency — nsa.gov
  • Australian Signals Directorate — asd.gov.au
  • Australian Cyber Security Centre — cyber.gov.au
  • Communications Security Establishment Canada — cse-cst.gc.ca
  • Cyber Security Agency of Singapore — csa.gov.sg
  • Computer Emergency Response Team for the European Union — cert.europa.eu
  • U.S. Election Assistance Commission — eac.gov
  • U.S. Federal Election Commission — fec.gov
  • Electoral Commission of the United Kingdom — electoralcommission.org.uk
  • Elections Canada — elections.ca
  • Office of Communications — ofcom.org.uk
  • Information Commissioner's Office — ico.org.uk
  • European Data Protection Board — edpb.europa.eu
  • European Data Protection Supervisor — edps.europa.eu

International Organisation

  • NATO — nato.int
  • Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe — osce.org
  • International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance — idea.int

Research / Journal

  • Nature — nature.com
  • Science (AAAS) — science.org
  • arXiv — arxiv.org
  • Association for Computing Machinery — acm.org
  • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers — ieee.org
  • USENIX Association — usenix.org
  • National Academy of Sciences — pnas.org

Primary Lab / Company

  • MITRE — mitre.org
  • Carnegie Mellon CERT Division — cert.org
  • Citizen Lab — citizenlab.ca

Non-Profit / Archive

  • Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams — first.org
  • Internet Engineering Task Force — ietf.org
  • International Organization for Standardization — iso.org
  • Open Worldwide Application Security Project — owasp.org
  • Shadowserver Foundation — shadowserver.org
  • International Foundation for Electoral Systems — ifes.org
  • Digital Forensic Research Lab — dfrlab.org

Applies to all topics (117)

  • United Nations — un.org
  • World Bank — worldbank.org
  • IMF — imf.org
  • OECD — oecd.org
  • U.S. National Academies — nationalacademies.org
  • World Health Organization — who.int
  • UNESCO — unesco.org
  • UN Environment Programme — unep.org
  • UN Development Programme — undp.org
  • International Telecommunication Union — itu.int
  • World Intellectual Property Organization — wipo.int
  • World Meteorological Organization — wmo.int
  • International Atomic Energy Agency — iaea.org
  • International Civil Aviation Organization — icao.int
  • International Maritime Organization — imo.org
  • UN Food and Agriculture Organization — fao.org
  • International Labour Organization — ilo.org
  • UNCTAD — unctad.org
  • UN Human Rights Office — ohchr.org
  • UN Refugee Agency — unhcr.org
  • International Organization for Migration — iom.int
  • UN Office on Drugs and Crime — unodc.org
  • UNICEF — unicef.org
  • World Food Programme — wfp.org
  • World Trade Organization — wto.org
  • Bank for International Settlements — bis.org
  • Financial Action Task Force — fatf-gafi.org
  • IPCC — ipcc.ch
  • International Renewable Energy Agency — irena.org
  • International Energy Agency — iea.org
  • African Union — au.int
  • ASEAN — asean.org
  • Organization of American States — oas.org
  • CARICOM — caricom.org
  • Pacific Islands Forum — forumsec.org
  • African Development Bank — afdb.org
  • Asian Development Bank — adb.org
  • Inter-American Development Bank — iadb.org
  • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank — aiib.org
  • EBRD — ebrd.com
  • Council of Europe — coe.int
  • South Africa Government — gov.za
  • Statistics South Africa — statssa.gov.za
  • South African Reserve Bank — resbank.co.za
  • Central Bank of Nigeria — cbn.gov.ng
  • Kenya National Bureau of Statistics — knbs.or.ke
  • Central Bank of Kenya — centralbank.go.ke
  • Bank of Ghana — bog.gov.gh
  • Central Bank of Egypt — cbe.org.eg
  • Bank Al-Maghrib (Morocco) — bkam.ma
  • Rwanda National Institute of Statistics — statistics.gov.rw
  • Government of China — gov.cn
  • China National Bureau of Statistics — stats.gov.cn
  • People's Bank of China — pbc.gov.cn
  • Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs — mofa.go.jp
  • Statistics Bureau of Japan — stat.go.jp
  • Bank of Japan — boj.or.jp
  • Government of South Korea — korea.kr
  • Bank of Korea — bok.or.kr
  • Statistics Korea — kostat.go.kr
  • Government of India — india.gov.in
  • Reserve Bank of India — rbi.org.in
  • India Ministry of Statistics — mospi.gov.in
  • Press Information Bureau of India — pib.gov.in
  • Government of Singapore — gov.sg
  • Monetary Authority of Singapore — mas.gov.sg
  • Singapore Department of Statistics — singstat.gov.sg
  • Bank Negara Malaysia — bnm.gov.my
  • Malaysia Department of Statistics — dosm.gov.my
  • Bank Indonesia — bi.go.id
  • Statistics Indonesia — bps.go.id
  • Bank of Thailand — bot.or.th
  • State Bank of Vietnam — sbv.gov.vn
  • State Bank of Pakistan — sbp.org.pk
  • Pakistan Bureau of Statistics — pbs.gov.pk
  • Bangladesh Bank — bb.org.bd
  • Central Bank of Sri Lanka — cbsl.gov.lk
  • Nepal Rastra Bank — nrb.org.np
  • Saudi Central Bank — sama.gov.sa
  • Saudi General Authority for Statistics — stats.gov.sa
  • United Arab Emirates Government — u.ae
  • Central Bank of the UAE — centralbank.ae
  • Qatar Central Bank — qcb.gov.qa
  • Bank of Israel — boi.org.il
  • Israel Central Bureau of Statistics — cbs.gov.il
  • Central Bank of Turkey — tcmb.gov.tr
  • Turkish Statistical Institute — tuik.gov.tr
  • Government of Brazil — gov.br
  • IBGE (Brazil statistics) — ibge.gov.br
  • Central Bank of Brazil — bcb.gov.br
  • Government of Mexico — gob.mx
  • INEGI (Mexico statistics) — inegi.org.mx
  • Bank of Mexico — banxico.org.mx
  • Government of Argentina — argentina.gob.ar
  • INDEC (Argentina statistics) — indec.gob.ar
  • Central Bank of Argentina — bcra.gob.ar
  • Central Bank of Chile — bcentral.cl
  • Chile National Statistics Institute — ine.cl
  • DANE (Colombia statistics) — dane.gov.co
  • Bank of the Republic (Colombia) — banrep.gov.co
  • Central Reserve Bank of Peru — bcrp.gob.pe
  • INEI (Peru statistics) — inei.gob.pe
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics — abs.gov.au
  • Reserve Bank of Australia — rba.gov.au
  • Government of New Zealand — govt.nz
  • Stats NZ — stats.govt.nz
  • Reserve Bank of New Zealand — rbnz.govt.nz
  • Government of the United Kingdom — gov.uk
  • UK Office for National Statistics — ons.gov.uk
  • Bank of England — bankofengland.co.uk
  • Swiss Federal Administration — admin.ch
  • Swiss National Bank — snb.ch
  • Statistics Norway — ssb.no
  • Statistics Sweden — scb.se
  • Government of Canada — canada.ca
  • Statistics Canada — statcan.gc.ca
  • Bank of Canada — bankofcanada.ca